Northern Michigan Guardsman says Iraq service cost him custody
AP ^ | 8/22/05

Northern Michigan Guardsman says Iraq service cost him custody

August 22, 2005

GRAND LEDGE, Mich. A Michigan Army National Guard member says that he lost shared custody of his ten-year-old son because he served in Iraq last year.

Thirty-three-year-old Specialist Joe McNeilly of Grand Ledge agreed to give temporary full-time custody to the mother of his son Joey.

But after he returned from Iraq, an Ingham County court referee recommended against restoring his shared custody.

The court and mother Holly Erb of Mason say McNeilly's deployment didn't cause the loss of custody.

State Representative Rick Jones says he'll develop legislation to bar courts from counting soldiers' military duty against them in custody cases.




1 posted on 08/22/2005 4:31:08 AM PDT by linkinpunk

To: linkinpunk
Michigan-a state that went solidily for Kerry, denying a custody to a combat veteran..


2 posted on 08/22/2005 4:33:25 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Islam-Hastening the Second Coming..)

To: linkinpunk
Sounds like he caused more problems in the kid's life before he ever left than the story is reporting.
3 posted on 08/22/2005 4:38:26 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)

To: cardinal4
Correction: "Allegedly" denying custody.

The court said that the deployment was not a factor. He said it was a factor.

The soldier has been given a lot of publicity on this. Now its up to him to prove his case.

4 posted on 08/22/2005 4:39:38 AM PDT by linkinpunk

To: linkinpunk
If the judge's car had a "celebrate diversity" bumper sticker, then I don't think he has to prove anything more.
5 posted on 08/22/2005 4:52:12 AM PDT by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)

To: cardinal4
Custody lawyer here. Let's assume that there is a case where the only factor is one of the parents is deployed overseas for a year. Other factors which would have to be considered would be the age of the child, the parenting skills of each parent, etc. The primary factor is most states is the "best interest of the child." In many states, the court's cannot modify custody unless there is a "material change in circumstance." One of the parents being absent for a year, no matter for what nobel purpose, would gualify as material.

The age is important because a one year old who goes a year without seeing a parent, assumes in his heart that the parent is dead and bonds to others. In fact, any of the first three years is very critical for bonding purposes.

I play, "if I were the judge" a lot. So here goes, if I were the judge in this case, I would order a reintegration so that the absence of the father would be dealt with by gradually increasing the time that the father spends with the child until it returns to something like 50/50.
6 posted on 08/22/2005 5:23:22 AM PDT by Mercat (God loves us where He finds us.)

To: Mercat
You just stated some of the primary reasons for my getting out of the military after 10 years. I had a daughter, and a bad marriage. I separated in order to try to save my marriage, but also with the knowledge that if I stayed in, and the marriage fell apart, I would likely never see my daughter on a regular basis again. Now, here I am, 11 years after getting out, divorced for five and a half years, and with sole custody of my 12 year old daughter. Oh - and an ex-wife who currently owes about $8,000 in back child support.
7 posted on 08/22/2005 5:58:13 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")

To: linkinpunk
its not his service that weighed negatively on his custody case. It's the fact he is male. Courts are consistently biased against men in custody cases. And for the lawyer on the thread, a father does not need to be reintegrated back into a child's life. Would you say the same for a mother.
 

8 posted on 08/22/2005 6:06:09 AM PDT by jasoncann


Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: linkinpunk
an outrage!
10 posted on 08/23/2005 8:08:51 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2003 Robinson-DeFehr Consulting, LLC.